Bunuel, maybe Lynch. I'd say Svankmaijer but he hasn't been prolific enough. @MUGGER1955 prob wouldn't be surprised by that
-
-
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS @MUGGER1955
Being prolific is important because you have to watch them over and over
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
A friend mentioned the Criterion Collection on her FB page. If you have access to that, these are the four directors whose work you'd want to watch: Krzysztof Kieslowski, Stanley Kubrick, Ingmar Bergman and Wes Anderson.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Barry Lyndon is another top-tier movie in my book. Bergman, Anderson, and Kieslowski are obv skilled but none of them do it for me, for various reasons. Fassbender, yes, Herzog yes albeit less so
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS @GerardPerry13 and
Cassavetes I'd say but I can't handle the pacing and the close ups anymore. Welles' weird stuff, like the Trial and Chimes at Midnight, is great, but he's inconsistent
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
-
Replying to @MUGGER1955 @GerardPerry13 and
The best filmmaker none of you have watched is
@heyralphman1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS @MUGGER1955 and
The best movie ever made about millennial media and the hot take era is his handiworkhttps://youtu.be/KX4uvBNzXlA
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
-
Watch that youtube link, guys. Ralph's movie is great
-
-
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS @heyralphman and
So he would be a director whose oeuvre should be on this specific list? I feel like that would be a risk for me
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SubBeck @heyralphman and
No, but he has made one movie and it's a good one. He also has great if forcefully argued opinions about cinema
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
