People pick their groceries more carefully than they pick their politicians and yet this is 75% of what Twitter is On One about. I remember surveying undergrads who would tell me their ideal candidate was a “little superstitious and a little religious.” Why not? I love to see it
-
Show this thread
-
Mostly your selections are influenced by bromides/cliches/slogans, family pressure, and in-group preferences. That’s it. Few people including the candidates vote policy outside of vague “feelings” they have, except for the political junkies, to whom this is everything
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
The height of a candidate, the candidate’s gender, a slogan or two...that’s all that really moves Joe the Plumber. One particular prejudice or another may keep you in one of the party blocs. That’s all there is to it. When I was a wee lad, I suspected there was more, but nope
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
The two parties function as pressure-release valves for one another. Tied of Coke? Drink Pepsi! It’s a little less rough on the tongue. A monarch or permanent head of state is at greater risk, since anger can be concentrated at them and they’ll wind up like Charles I
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
BUT “policy” is good if you can fundraise off it or get one of those Andrew Yang-type commentary slots based on it. There’s a man who raised his basic income and basic brand visibility by doing the work. You love to see it
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
If you’ve ever worked in a huge company, you know that the vast middle echelon of that beast is set up to function entirely on mediocre or distracted work. So is the government. People move up and down, get promotions, entirely to “hit” various staffing goals the company has
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
