I love that the finest analysis from the Nates doing the work, Silver and Cohn, amounts to little more than "Sanders could win big unless he doesn't" and "he could lose if he doesn't win." We're still at folk-meteorology, Farmer's Almanac levels of analysis on polling
-
Show this thread
-
He performed well before so he could regress, unless he gets a bounce. You love to see it. Pay me six figures and I'll type all the words that are just as probative as astrology but less colorful and high fantasy-oriented
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @clinicalwstmn @PhDhurtBrain
I heard the shizznit is gonna hit the fizzan in 1848...keep that year in mind...1848...that’s gonna be a big 1
9:54 PM - 25 Feb 2020
from Pittsburgh, PA
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
