I love that the finest analysis from the Nates doing the work, Silver and Cohn, amounts to little more than "Sanders could win big unless he doesn't" and "he could lose if he doesn't win." We're still at folk-meteorology, Farmer's Almanac levels of analysis on polling
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @sinistrallean
You need points, whether it's a lot or just a few. A few if the other team doesn't have many. A win's a win but some wins are better than others, eh
@SirJonSherrit7 ?4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
-
Replying to @spongeworthy2 @MUGGER1955 and
That's right. I'm big league. You love to see it
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS @MUGGER1955 and
I really do. I can't be far behind!
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @spongeworthy2 @MUGGER1955 and
One tweet at a time. Doing the work!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SirJonSherrit7 @spongeworthy2 and
Here for it
5:14 PM - 25 Feb 2020
from Pittsburgh, PA
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
