He performed well before so he could regress, unless he gets a bounce. You love to see it. Pay me six figures and I'll type all the words that are just as probative as astrology but less colorful and high fantasy-oriented
Show this thread
I love that the finest analysis from the Nates doing the work, Silver and Cohn, amounts to little more than "Sanders could win big unless he doesn't" and "he could lose if he doesn't win." We're still at folk-meteorology, Farmer's Almanac levels of analysis on polling
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You need points, whether it's a lot or just a few. A few if the other team doesn't have many. A win's a win but some wins are better than others, eh
@SirJonSherrit7 ? - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Our model is also agnostic on whether he will win the nomination if he does in fact win. But no matter of what happens, we'll be here for it.
-
There is a 100% probability of us having a model
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.