i was a debater for many years, taught debate and forensics, and can say this about the way we do these presidential debates: 1) there's no way to "win" them 2) at most you can mouth platitudes 3) people remember one-liners and weird facial tics/fashion gaffes and little else
-
Show this thread
-
moot court is a bland, boring format that favors fact memorizers with smooth-jazz radio host voices, like ted olson and ted cruz, but these roundtable debates favor goofballs who say wacky, meme-able shit. looking for "substance" here is a no-go
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
think about your own presentations. how well, esp. as you age, can you remember facts "off-book" or "off-powerpoint?" probably poorly. i'm good, v. good in fact, but nothing i say is as precise as if i were fact-checking it while i typed it. and so the debates fail here too
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
candidates, with the exceptions of these overpowering loony bin personalities, are interchangeable. at most they represent some local/community interest of yours, so you can tick off that box. the ones with truly radical policies will never make it to the big stage.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS
I like Sanders to an extent but I’m increasingly aware of how impossible it is that I will ever see a candidate I truly like
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
you'll never see anything you'll like, but you can sell some hot takes arguing the salted gruel is better than the unsalted gruel, which has lost its savor
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
