i'd rather fire someone on the suspicion of doing something, even if they're guilty of nothing, because that way you're "getting out ahead of the weather" as they say repeatedly in the rom-com classic "Groundhog Day"
Show this thread
[sticks e-finger in the air] seems like the take-winds are beginning to shift a bit, at least in the centerhttps://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1153265155825909760 …
-
-
-
it's much harder to justify firing someone after they've actually done something, because it's in the past. but if you can fire them before they do anything, on the mere suspicion that they COULD eventually do something, then it's much safer and more "moral," as it were.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My position, alas, has always remained the same: I want all of them to resign, but that’s because they’re working politicians serving the US of A, not because of transgressions against an evolving hot take order
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
The article’s a bit strange considering her background on Thomas/Hill.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
May be some fallout from the Kevin Spacey case-drop. Re Franken-- the "joke" photo was what did him in. That leer and the groping paws.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.