I saw a post about the necessity of calling Epstein's 14 year old alleged victims "children" versus "underage" and then a very 2019 furious response about how this is denying agency to poor and underrepresented "grown" women
Show this thread
I have no take on the takes but it appears to be turtles all the way down. Others leapt in to defend the sanctity of sex workers, the necessity of redefining age of consent laws, the problematic notion that "children" belong to archaic "families" instead of themselves, etc.
-
-
at the very bottom a relative stressed the importance of making this about Trump and not Clinton, lest this hurt Clinton's 2020 bid for the presidency (the Clinton wasn't specified). It seems like Epstein, who ppl are now trying to define as "not a billionaire," is polarizing
Show this thread -
As a survivor of some truly insane stuff I can't ever begin to recap here, all I can say is, if a person is being propositioned by the rich, the power, and the so called "great," age and consent barely factor into that equation. The mighty take what they want until they can't
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.