As a professor, my most controversial position was that I didn't care at all about plagiarism. a) they at least found some material b) it was probably better written than most of what I received c) privileging "originality" is a very bougie and culturally insensitive position
-
Show this thread
-
I would of course explain to plagiarist that others would take a harder line, and that the lives of some academics were so tied up with pedantic notions of citation that they wouldn't hesitate to destroy a life over a forgotten footnote
2 replies 2 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
All too often this was used as a way to expel southeast Asian, African, and Eastern European students, and that angered me
1 reply 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
The western tradition is pretty much built on plagiarism. So much of the work of Jerome and the other "church fathers" was just them writing down shit they'd memorized. Some of their most famous medieval work was people "glossing" the earlier work of others (much of it borrowed)
2 replies 3 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS
So many textbooks are identical; isn’t this plagiarism? A privileged kind of plagiarism?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Absolutely right. I wrote (plagiarized) some of that dreary content in my younger days, and used other textbooks as my reference
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
