I've written some decent features, but my ceiling as a writer of features will always be a) the publications that publish my work aren't the ones publicists and celebs want to see their names appearing in (i.e., not "legacy media"), and b) I don't put people over in my work
-
-
I rarely profile "creatives," either, because why should I waste my shot in a magazine putting over some other "creative," doing their hype work for them, when I have to maximize my own revenue. I'll make an exception when the person is a true legend, like Ben Katchor
Show this thread -
And if I single out a writer as an inspiration, like Ralph Wiley or CLR James or George Schuyler, that is because I have studied their sentences in such detail that I am shamelessly paraphrasing them nonstop. Whole "heart punch" paragraphs of mine are homages to other work
Show this thread -
In fact, if you bother to read the stuff I write, the easter egg is I'm constantly referencing every prior story and many prior sentences or sentiments, which are in turn derived from intense study of the "commonplace book" or "vade mecum" I've been compiling since '96
Show this thread -
In a marketplace of pushing paper or selling takes or whatever we might call this last gasp of for-pay writing, this is my concession to art, to my personal aesthetic, to the life I've lived as exemplified in what I've created (however poorly, hastily, etc.)
Show this thread -
The people who makethe best interview subjects are the ones who have nothing to lose or gain by talking to me, and thus can answer the questions readers might want to see addressed. All too often, these interview subjects are eccentric older people who have left the marketplace
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Staying in my lane" is very Camden Camden.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
