"Rome is in error" Does Rome add requirements to be saved?
-
-
Replying to @MountainXeer @DrOakley1689
If you’re asking me to reject Rome’s errors I’m way ahead. For instance I believe Baptists to be in deep error and full blown heterodoxy in regards to the sacraments but nonetheless, I consider you brothers
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paleomexicano @DrOakley1689
Sir..... stop dodging. A man who claims to pull Christ down from heaven to offer him up as the eternal victim for the sins of the world.... and that to receive him, you must consume the elements. Is that a saving gospel?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MountainXeer @DrOakley1689
This is an erroneous understanding of the real presence (which is true), however i also disagree with Lutherans on the real presence (Calvin taught that the Body & Blood of Our Lord are present but spiritually) but I don’t hold that they are in hell for it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paleomexicano @DrOakley1689
So.. when you say it is an erroneous understanding, you are claiming that a Roman Priest, who wrote one of the most influencial books on Roman Theology (Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma.), doesn't understand his own theology? Perhaps, you don't understand ?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MountainXeer @DrOakley1689
Of course I believe Rome is in error, it’s very own ecclesiastical understanding demands contradiction (Unam Sanctam v Vatican II) if I didn’t, I’d be a Roman Catholic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paleomexicano @DrOakley1689
Sir.... you claimed that I didn't understand the mass, I jsut presented you the material that I quoted from. Just to understand, are you saying that the Roman Priest who wrote that statement doesn't understand the mass?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MountainXeer @DrOakley1689
If you’re asking me if the Roman mass is an erroneous understanding of the real presence & how it is a sacrifice then I’ve answered your question ad Infinitum. I’ve answered all your questions, you just don’t like my final answer
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paleomexicano @DrOakley1689
I'm asking you, if forcing Rome's view "in order to be saved" is a false gospel. According to Rome, if you don't believe the bread and wine is Christ, you are accursed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MountainXeer @DrOakley1689
I’ve answered this what feels like a dozen times now. One can be in serious error and yet retain the core of the gospel truth, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ & ye shall be saved. I look forward to you, JPII and I worshipping in heaven together
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sir... what is the gospel truth? What is the gospel? Why did Paul teach that if one added circumcision to the gospel then it was no longer the true gospel?
-
-
Replying to @MountainXeer @DrOakley1689
I’ve cited the gospel truth ad infinitum and this is rapidly getting boring.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.