Data seems clear Chemical Ag=antiquated destructive way to farm Leeches into water system, volatilizes into air N algae blooms =dead zonespic.twitter.com/auqZmvfpR4
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Data seems clear Chemical Ag=antiquated destructive way to farm Leeches into water system, volatilizes into air N algae blooms =dead zonespic.twitter.com/auqZmvfpR4
Iowa went from being 26th highest rate of Non-Hoskin Lymphoma Pre-intro of "Round-up ready" seeds (meaning baste crops in it) To #1 by '06.!
Monsanto Spin Doctors Target Cancer Scientist in Flawed Reuters Story
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/monsanto-spin-doctors-target-cancer-scientist-in-flawed_us_594449eae4b0940f84fe2e57 …? and @MotherJones follows. Ashaming.
Thanking you for helping to set the record straight!
Completely lacks the broader context of claims against glyphosate made by marginal communities next to GE-soy fields. Garbage journalism.
Money. It's all about the money. Even if runoff gets into your own glass of water & kills your family; you lived well in comfort. GOP
Remember DDT, now generations of third world human beings have been lost to malaria because of faulty "science."
The yahoo wingnuts will use thus to attack all science. The real lesson us the value of independent GOVT SPONSORED research.
Monsanto anonymous tolls without iota of cred & relevant expertise don't make science arbiters. Unpub data showed increased lymphoma rates,
Enlightening. Pretty certain Roundup has been around longer than indicated. Doesn't take from articles point
What if his data is actually wrong?
Data is data. Not right or wrong. His methodology is wrong. Excluding that data makes the report wrong. @MotherJones
Did you even read why his data was not used? The review board had a policy to not use unpublished date & his was not
It's a BS response. He knew reputable data existed refuting his findings. HIS data. He's obliged to cite it. @MotherJones
Not BS. It was their rule not to use unpublished data, & he didn't publish. It's not like he withheld causes cancer.
You have no idea. No individual rule about basic ethics. He KNEW data refuted his conclusion but omitted it. @MotherJones
You have no idea the IARC had a rule to NOT USE UNPUBLISHED DATA! If you really care, stop trolling & contact IARC 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.