Now if we get background checks to learn when domestic abusers are trying to buy guns 100% of the time, THAT can make a change.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
. Please list the justices who voted against this!
-
vote was 6 to 2, Thomas & Sotomayor voted AGAINST it...weird huh? Here's Thomas's 3 q'shttp://bit.ly/2930znL
-
. Do you know S's objections?
-
don't need the trolls to agree or disagree w/me coz I ran out of f's LoL
-
. Thanks for attempting explanation w 140 chs. I'll get opinion from SCOTUS blog and read.
-
sent you the link you didn't see it? it's Thomas's decision published
-
. Got it! Thanks.
-
Look at page 16 of 34
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@MarkCGlaze: The nerdy headline would read "Supreme Court Just Ruled That the Word 'Use' Includes a Mens Rea of 'Recklessness'"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GREAT day for the Women of America!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eenayo there are really people around who think domestic abusers should have guns? Wow, smdh.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You would think no one would object to this, right? Because it's totally obvious?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's a start...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hart MOM...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
34 pages of legalese, you couldn't give a summary?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.