The name of the offense is perhaps inapt. We distinguish murder from other forms of criminal death-causing; likewise we distinguish "committed a felony which caused a death" from murder, but still use the word "murder" in its name.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GlomarNeverDies @MorlockP
There still seems to be some kind of disconnect, where a result like the one under discussion seems counter-intuitive. This strikes me as the stuff of law school hypotheticals involving people firing guns they thought were unloaded at people who jumped off ledges.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GlomarNeverDies @random_eddie
I think Eddie's point about "law school hypothetical shooting a gun he THOUGHT was loaded" is relevant if both intent AND effects match, then you've got a match ("duck typing" for crimes) you join a gang armed with a gun to threaten someone w murder unless he hands over wallet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
intent? Take something that's not yours using the threat of murder. effect? Dead body. would this have happened minus your gang? no we have joint liability for apartment leases, why not for murder?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.