93/
Oh, fun!
@reason and @VolokhC have picked up on how @AlexNowrasteh and @CatoInstitute presented data that said that immigration is bad for liberty and then falsely characterized it as saying immigration is good for liberty.
You're big time, Alex!https://twitter.com/MarkSKrikorian/status/993923890509418498 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
105/ Here's the side-by-side showing that
@AlexNowrasteh understood the objections as valid 4.5 years ago but then stonewalled and dismissed my independent discovery of the issue as "anonymous trolling" (The@CatoInstitute logo is nice and crisp, reminding us all WBTI.)pic.twitter.com/uvA0pyVCQO
Show this thread -
105/
@wraithburn got@AlexNowrasteh to admit that first generation immigrants do in facto vote more Dem than natives. (just like their children and grandchildren do) Question for@CatoInstitute - why are you in favor of more immigration when your own ppl say they vote Dem?pic.twitter.com/Y1slJvegKz
Show this thread -
106/ LOL,
@AlexNowrasteh now has the assistance of some white knight who is connecting traits like!e "uses logic to dissect propaganda" & "wants a retraction of false data" to white supremacy. Good points;@AlexNowrasteh and@CatoInstitute should adopt!https://twitter.com/Sxeptomaniac/status/993887383064989696?s=19 …Show this thread -
107/ yes, that was choice; let me dig it up so that others may enjoy...https://twitter.com/wraithburn/status/994561014132822017 …
Show this thread -
-
109/
@AlexNowrasteh engages lots of credentialism and ad hominems: calls people "trolls", "anonymous", "fools", etc. The one thing he won't do is admit that his immigration plans are bad for American liberty (...according to the GSS data that underlies his white papers!)Show this thread -
110/ I see
@AlexNowrasteh and@CatoInstitute have another paper. "Immigrants...consume a lower dollar value of benefits than native-born Americans." Interesting. One question: given that benefits are funded by progressive income taxes, who pays?https://twitter.com/CatoInstitute/status/994656789668028421 …
Show this thread -
111/ Given that most immigrants are poor, and poor people in the US pay close to zero in income taxes, I'll bet
@AlexNowrasteh a nickel that immigrants take more out of the welfare system than they pay into it. Want to make that bet@AlexNowrasteh ?Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You just said that either usage is acceptable. Since Cato's paper is talking about statistical significance, the 4% is the one you'd use, because that's in relation to the overall population. 25% is the relationship between the two numbers, but has no bearing on significance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
2) "muh tacos!"
3) "yes, they're socialists...but the difference is 2.75 vs 3.18 on a 5 point scale, so only a difference of 8.6% of scale range, so MAYBE won't tip elections"
>>>