73/
It's not a 3% difference; it's more like 20+%.
...and I'm not asking for a "safe space" free of bad opinions.
I'm asking that @AlexNowrasteh
and @CatoInstitute
not import socialist voters who will raise my taxes and increase gov.
Different thing.
https://twitter.com/charliesixtwo/status/993678936428204032?s=19 …
-
-
Okay, but in a survey of 1500, 4% is not statistically significant (which is what Cato's paper said). You rephrased it to say its a 25% increase b/w two groups, but that doesn't make the difference any more statistically significant. At best, its willfully misleading.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When we're discussing statistical significance, which Cato's paper is doing and you are responding to, one of those is proper and the other is not. Not because its technically inaccurate, but because its needlessly confusing (unless confusing your audience is your intention).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.