"You get angry (at least judging by your tweets) at proponents of benefits programs." Proponents - yes Recipients - no I see the recipients as mostly being in need. I see the proponents as mostly being political actors who have strong thoughts about what must be taken from ME
-
-
re terror of incels - I'd bet that the statistics show that incels are actually far less likely to rape (just a hunch) in the same way that the truly destitute (often physically handicapped, often immobile bc no car) are less likely to burglar from me than the kid 1 block over
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Knowing a bunch of people hate you and would like you dead or raped & their hero is a guy who killed a bunch of women is scary. I think a lot of the joking you are seeing roasting inc3ls is people handling their fear via humor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't necessarily agree with "ha look at the losers" only because it feeds a persecution complex.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @popelizbet @St_Rev
I see incels as similar to very poor people - they've somehow fallen off the bottom rung of the ladder, and either don't have the natural talents or the knowledge of how to get on the ladder. That doesn't stop them from trying, but the attempts all fail. Failure -> bitterness
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think they're in a deeply toxic negative feedback loop for the most part, where they hate all women because it gets them peer approval & lessens their shame at "failing"* as men. *I don't see not having sex as a failing: the culture, largely, does.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But in the meantime while they're fetishizing Rodger & proposing sex workers be forced to fuck them my response is "danger: avoid."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @popelizbet @St_Rev
A big question I have is "who are 'they' ?" All incels? 10 guys? I don't know. Having been in that demographic and having had lots of friends in it (STEM undergrad!), I didn't know a single one who hated women / advocated rape / etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
and re "forced" - I am 100% serious when I say that the logic that supports taxation to provide any food or housing or education over the pure minimum is EXACTLY applicable to the logic of using tax dollars to pay for sex workers for the incels redistribution is good, no?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You missed a nuance. Buy sex workers time would be one thing. "No right of refusal by the sex worker" is something quite different. Money is different than bodies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
didn't miss it; headed off in a slight tangent
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.