let's not start using the term 'poor' as if it's a valid concept. it isn't. no one is owed money. we already *have* a word for those who call themselves 'poor': 'thief'pic.twitter.com/ljmdKgzzaW
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It’s just so weird I have trouble with the cognitive dissonance from the same types who are all about acceptance. “Fatties need love, porn stars need love, but ugly, weird niggas can kill them selves”
When it comes to the sexual marketplace, most socialists are the kind of ruthless ancap who'd make Ayn Rand blush.
Interesting - Just today I've read this very good article and it cited Houellebecq who compared economic liberalism with sexual liberalism: https://jacobitemag.com/2018/04/24/uncanny-vulvas/ …pic.twitter.com/XED8dWu3wP
Yeah, I saw that passage a few days ago but couldn't remember where.
So serious question: what is the appropriate response to men who believe they're entitled to sex without consent & celebrate a spree killer who killed women for revenge as their hero? Because I've gone with "terror" since Elliot Rodger & am no less terrified now.
I think the term for men who believe they're entitled to sex without consent is 'rapist'. nb: Elliot Rodger killed twice as many men as women. Seven men are murdered for every two women in the US. I would politely suggest that your terror is misplaced.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.