It need not be just one thing. I suggest that people who carefully choose sperm donors, adoptive children, and employees for their startups are making very very smart choices that impact happiness and utility.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @adamgurri @drethelin
Concur! One can be pro eugenics (propogation of good genes) without being pro-abortion (destruction of bad genes). Also, on a tangent: Downs is not hereditary in a simple sense, so aborting Downs kids isn't actually "purifying" the gene pool.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @adamgurri @drethelin
well, I agree with that! I think that one big problem in the mainstream left today is that they've sworn off their early 20th century eugenicist POLICIES, but still 100% agree with the underlying materialist view of things. This is why they're always calling red tribe >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
"inbred", "stupid", etc, why they argue that "white people should go extinct", why they use intelligence as a proxy for goodness or worth, etc.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @adamgurri @drethelin
so you're saying that liberals did something right?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I'm largely making a joke. Perhaps shouldn't have, in the midst of an otherwise serious and excellent conversation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.