So it seems that to be logically consistent we need to conclude: * yes, Lincoln was a blood soaked tyrant (and Pinochet was pretty bad too) or * war in defense of human rights is legit, Pinochet did a much better job than Lincoln but "Pinochet bad; Lincoln good" is right out
"Doesn’t mean the only answer was political repression." OK, great. Now, let's apply this same standard to ending slavery in the US. UK ended slavery without a single person being killed. Lincoln killed 3% of the US population. Should be not recoil in horror from that?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.