Look, you basically have two choices: Negative freedom, the freedom from external influence/contact. eg fascism, localism, primitivism, identity, borders, laws, traditions, etc Positive freedom, the freedom to act and collaborate. eg anarchism, globalism, decentralization, etc
-
-
This isn't a legal system, it's an ethics. Enforcement is not the point, it's about illuminating our goals. Individual agency to opt out / to commit suicide / whatever should of course not be infringed, but we get to choose what sort of world we collaboratively build.
-
Do we build a world that enables and encourages connection, or one of isolated prisons (that we call "communities")? One can argue and work towards a better (ie more interconnected) world without trying to impose it via the barrel of a gun.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.