Actually, those matches look a lot like exclamation points, don't they? So you could have 5118!!, which might win.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BrowningMachine @LibertyFarmNH and
As would I. So it's 5118^11, strictly. With relaxed rules, 11^5118, then 11^8115, then 5118!!, then 8115!!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BostonDelendEst @BrowningMachine and
The rules asks for a "number". 12 is a number 12^100 is not a number; it is an expression that EVALUATES to a number
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
-
Replying to @BostonDelendEst @BrowningMachine and
normally you're the sort of one to step in and do it, but you went soft so I had to step up
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @BrowningMachine and
Just so we're clear, you're using "number" to mean "collection of digits". And that there's no way to write, e.g., SQRT(2) as a number.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BostonDelendEst @MorlockP and
I mean, I LOVE how formalistic & technical your argument is. But it excludes irrational numbers from the def, which seems a facial flaw.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BostonDelendEst @BrowningMachine and
also, I've had my head in formal parser theory for ~ 1 month, so I am very spergy about the distinction right now
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
will DM
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.