a) Ambiguous. No, it's not. b) Written as intended. No, it's not. c) Drafting error. No, it's not. It's just a mistake. Those happen.
@random_eddie re 'b' - why your confidence? It seems like it could have been intended to incentivize states to set up exchanges.
-
-
@MorlockP I agree that it could have been. I don't think it was. -
@MorlockP More to your point - lacking evidence that that's what was intended, it seems to me very unlikely that that's what was intended. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.