Can't be me today,but someone should check Federalist papers;I think Madison,maybe Hamilton,specifically used Islam as example @nkjemisin
-
-
Replying to @JohnBarnesSF
1/
@JohnBarnesSF@nkjemisin There's interesting point that ∃ 2-D ideology space: theology v governance. Islam is (1,1), CCCP is (1,0), etc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
2/ USG is empowered to declare that Nazism is incompatible w liberal democracy and restrict immigration on basis
@JohnBarnesSF@nkjemisin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
3/ While I'm not advocating for it, it seems plausible that "do you advocate for Sharia?" would be reasonable Q.
@JohnBarnesSF@nkjemisin11 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LibertyFarmNH
What is ANYONE supposed to do with the 1st Amendment but "exploit" it? That's what it's for.
@LibertyFarmNH@MorlockP@nkjemisin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JohnBarnesSF
@JohnBarnesSF@nkjemisin Meh. Depends on definition of exploit. Not defending@LibertyFarmNH pt, but concern of "the last election" is valid1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
@JohnBarnesSF@LibertyFarmNH so consider definition of "exploit" as "overturning the system that allowed it in the first place".2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@JohnBarnesSF @LibertyFarmNH Usage of X that allows more usage = OK.
Usage of X that terminates = exploit.
e.g.: voting, logging, IT, etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.