Once again, for those who missed it (and care, i.e. nobody): I support SSM, when enacted by legislation/referendum, not judicial preference.
-
-
Replying to @random_eddie
Nonsense. SSM when pushed through by activist judges will have same long term cultural win, unanimity as Row v Wade!
@random_eddie1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SmithwickDetenh
.
@SmithwickDetenh@MorlockP I'm not convinced that SSM-bans are unconstitutional or that judges are using sound constitutional reasoning.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SmithwickDetenh
@SmithwickDetenh@random_eddie Yes, we've read their decisions. And we think they're wrong. Saying "They disagree" is tautological.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @SmithwickDetenh
@SmithwickDetenh @random_eddie Elite schooled New Yorker readers of BOTH parties agree w elite schooled New Yorker reading consensus.
Meh.
1:11 PM - 20 May 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.