.@ramez @Noahpinion So why has each subsequent IPCC report had to correct downward from previous after projected warming failed to occur?
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP
@MorlockP Warming is proceeding apace. Conversely, Arctic is melting ~100 years earlier than IPCC predicted.@Noahpinion1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ramez
.
@ramez@Noahpinion Do you or do you not acknowledge that each IPCC report corrects downward from prev? If not, I'm happy to cite evidence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
@MorlockP What would that convince me of other than the IPCC being conservative?@Noahpinion2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ramez
.
@ramez@Noahpinion One frankly quakes to consider what you might consider "neutral".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
@MorlockP Modeling is full of uncertainty. Where IPCC has underestimated change it's dramatically larger than overestimates.@Noahpinion1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ramez
.
@ramez@Noahpinion Yes modeling is uncertain. But IPCC always overestimates and has to retract and downgrade as evidence comes out, agreed?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
@MorlockP No, not agreed. Not even close. E.g, Sea ice melting roughly 100 yrs faster than IPCC projections.pic.twitter.com/liEr6rQ9os
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
.@Rebel_Bill @ramez One does not need background in climatology to note that the IPCC reports (political documents) full of backpedalling.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.