Man who married into the Kennedy clan agrees w the Dems that Jan 6th was a neo-Nazi insurrection / attempted coup, and also just happens to agree w the CIA color revolution in Ukraine is good. Really makes you think. I'm certainly reconsidering my priors.https://twitter.com/Schwarzenegger/status/1504426844199669762 …
-
-
-
11/ If thinking about US foreign policy through a moral lens is wrong ... what's the right approach? I suspect that Noam actually does agree that US foreign policy should be moral, he just didn't like my stance that the Ukraine question is complicated, and >>>
Show this thread -
12/ we and the Ukranians are on the better of the two sides, but do not have entirely clean hands. The US choice-architected Russia into this war in the exact same way that FDR fanned the flames of Japanese expansion and made Pearl Harbor inevitable.
Show this thread -
13/ As Ahnold said in the video, it's ok to admit when a government behaves poorly. US government has behaved not just poorly (in a moral sense) but stupidly, in a strategic sense, by trying to push alliances so close to Russia. Foreign policy experts on our side warned re this
Show this thread -
14/ This is an ad hominem re Michael Tracy,
@neontaster. Michael could be Hitler himself, but his point re your think tank work and connection to neocon world is either true or false. Which is it? True, of course. If it was false, you're say so. https://twitter.com/neontaster/status/1504448117378371591 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
15/ Star Wars is good entertainment. I saw it in the theater as a kid, and watched it a dozen times since. Good vs evil, no nuance, brave overmatched rebels ... great drama. ...but the real world is usually more complicated. If the foreign policy establishment tells you >>>
Show this thread -
16/ that some particular fight between East Bumistan and West Bumistan is a fight between pure good and pure evil, orphans and plucky working mothers on the one side, and stormtroopers on the other side ... don't trust that. That's propoganda.
Show this thread -
17/ Your tweet was "This guy is so oblivious that he thinks an evenhanded point is to cite the guy who doxed me". You may be factually correct that MT doxed you...but your "rebuttal" to my point that you worked for a neocon think tank is an ad hominem https://twitter.com/neontaster/status/1504448938790764551 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
18/ If you didn't work at a neocon think tank, say so. If you're not related to a famous neocon (not a taint by blood, but suggestive of household culture, family loyalties, etc.) say so. Saying "TJIC cites MT for the source of this claim and MT is bad" is >>>
Show this thread -
19/ either an ad hominem vs Michael Tracy, or the genetic fallacy, perhaps, because my data comes from a source you dislike.
Show this thread -
20/ ok, this is an actual rebuttal, and my it shows that my claim was somewhere between "not useful" and "flat out wrong". I retract it and apologize to you
@neontaster . https://twitter.com/neontaster/status/1504450491287224327 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
21/ anyway, I continue to think that
@neontaster is a fine person and I enjoyed being mutuals with him. I have no particular fight there.Show this thread -
22/ I did google it, Noam. I google pretty close to absolutely everything before I state it in a twitter thread. (or, rather, used Brave search engine). If there's some hit on the first page of results that would have clarified, I didn't see it. >>> https://twitter.com/neontaster/status/1504451113420046340 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
23/ In my attempting to verify the information - BEFORE POSTING - I also googled for your name with "site: hudson institute", looked at linkedin, etc. I make mistakes all the time, but usually not ones out of laziness. I retract when corrected.
Show this thread -
24/ Anyway,
@neontaster and I are cool now. We both got hot under the collar.Show this thread -
25/ A term that a socialist Michael Harrington coined in 1973 to refer to Democrats who were pro-war is "anti-semitic" ? Even if your claim was true (a) again, genetic fallacy, (b) I don't care. I refuse to stop using useful terms bc someone is upset.https://twitter.com/Gatoraid20/status/1504456833980903425 …
Show this thread -
26/ > How about actually explaining what is wrong with interventionism? * it costs US dollars * it costs US lives * it's not our right * the USG does not have the legal authority to do with without a declaration of war
Show this thread -
27/ Have you volunteered to go fight the Russians in Ukraine,
@Gatoraid20 ? If not, maybe stop trying to spend other people's dollars and lives in something you don't apparently care THAT much about.Show this thread -
28/ > Would you have not intervened in WW2 to stop the Holocaust? First, the US did not intervene in WW2 to stop the Holocaust. Second, the Nazis, while absolutely terrible, did not architect the Holocaust qua the Holocaust until after US blockades, etc. Without US >>>
Show this thread -
29/ involvement it is plausible that the antisemitic and murderous Nazis would have done something else like the original plan to relocate populations to Madagascar. Retconning WWII into "US intervened to stop the Holocaust" is lazy and propogandistic. Actual rhetoric >>>
Show this thread -
30/ at the time was off in the direction of "OMG OMG OMG the secret German plan to invade the US through Mexico!!!".
Show this thread -
31/ Always remember that war is the health of the state.
Show this thread -
32/ no, I entirely get that it's a bad thing. I'm just saying that it's also a COMPLICATED thing, where the US foreign policy establishment worked hard, over a decade, to push Putin into a lose/lose horns-of-a-dilemma where if he does nothing >>>https://twitter.com/derail33462704/status/1504456207192498184 …
Show this thread -
33/ Ukraine slides into the NATO / EU / American orbit, and if he does something, then Ukranians and Russian conscripts die, and he looks terrible on the international stage.
Show this thread -
34/ In law, you can't claim self defense in a fight that you've initiated or escalated. I'm pointing out that perhaps we should use a similar moral principle - not to argue that Ukranians shouldn't defend themselves (they should!) - but to argue that this situation was CREATED
Show this thread -
35/ The scene: 1am, outside a liquor store. Five drunks with broken bottles and switchblades are menacing two other unarmed drunks. Should "we" get involved? What if I told you that we'd been telling those two other drunks for ten years "if you piss on those guy's shoes...
Show this thread -
36/ ...we've got your back" ? Is this still a smart fight? Is this something that uninvolved third parties (like American taxpayers) should have to contribute to? Should Americans die in this fight? The whole situation was CREATED. Not a conspiracy theory. It's documented.
Show this thread -
37/ I am literally an anarchist, man. I support the right of people to donate money and sign up for a volunteer legion. If people want to donate $10B, and 5k people want to fight, more power to them.https://twitter.com/Gatoraid20/status/1504459540103942150 …
Show this thread -
38/ I 100% agree. Every party has agency. I'm not saying "US bad, US caused all of this, other side has no agency, is just reactive". Takes N to tango.https://twitter.com/JayGSlater/status/1504460828824715271 …
Show this thread -
39/ I don't remotely give a shit if my suggestion is "awful" or not. My suggestions are either true or false. If they are false, give me evidence, and I will apologize and retract. "Awful" is a shaming tool used by women on other women. >>>https://twitter.com/n0th1ngm4n/status/1504461360331165702 …
Show this thread - Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.