Disagree w Alan here. A lot of people don't want to live in cities, even if they could have large apartments. There's so much to hate! * crime * diversity (but I repeat myself) * noise * litter * lack of parking * corrupt Dem machine politics * pollution * ...the list goes on.https://twitter.com/AlanMCole/status/1503919903040053251 …
and I'd agree w that red triber that his argument was well formed - just as I'm agreeing w Alan who is arguing for cities (which I dislike) that HIS argument is well formed.
-
-
I've said before (and I believe you were in the thread) that 'revealed preference' is a bad name but it's a narrow concept, and you can't compare and conflate with /preferences/ which is why it's a bad name "real choices" expresses it better and avoids the trap /
-
I suggest we renamed "revealed preference" to "gate" and "real choice" to "wing". That will surely make this easier to reason about.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would argue the difference is qualitative re:zoning. We can increase supply of steak to reduce price without substantially changing the experiential difference of consuming steak v burgers. You cannot do so when driving down $$per square ft by increasing density. Apples/oranges
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.