17/ "actually...please withdraw your oppositional filing to the lawsuit and tell the courts that we will not be defending the illegal issuance of the variance" ...it still might be fun to hold them over the edge of the volcano and see what they're made of.
-
Show this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted D.J. Schreffler
18/ oh, no, I'm gonna crush them all it's just that if they give up on this legal defense, my legal bills go down a bithttps://twitter.com/DJSchreffler/status/1501219385951801346 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
1 reply 0 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
2 replies 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs
20/ oh, re "board deliberations are secret, until after legal matters are resolved" >>>https://twitter.com/MorlockP/status/1501210412284526592 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs @MorlockP4/ So, this brings us to today's development. BoS has 5 members, with staggered 3 year terms. Votes re legal matters are secret...until those legal matters are conclude. So I don't know if the BoS has been fighting me in court instead of conceding by 5-0 vote, 4-1, or 3-2.Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
21/ The NH law says: * all meetings need to be documented * "public" meetings need to have public present, and documents released immediately * "non public meetings" (for a dozen reasons) can exclude public, and release minutes later * meetings w counsel are not "meetings"
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
23/ so if the Board of Selectmen met at any point to DECIDE if they should defend against my lawsuit, or DECIDE if they should spend public moneys defending against my lawsuit...they're allowed to do so in private...but (a) they need to keep minutes (b) they need to release them
2 replies 0 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
24/ The BoS, however, is trying to use this clause "we never had a meeting ... we just TOOK ADVICE"pic.twitter.com/iXwE3PU3QP
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
25/ And that's somewhat reasonable. The contents of the legal strategy might still want to be privileged. ...BUT... is the BoS saying that they NEVER TOOK A VOTE to decide on their policy? If so, how do we know if a majority of them were in favor of a stupid waste of $20k ?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
26/ There will probably be a lawsuit over this at some point.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted 🍂 The Pectrichory 🍄
27/ Lawsuit against neighbor for nuisance and [ water ] trespass has been scheduled. We get to court in Sep 2023 ( twenty THREE !!! ) Lawsuit against town for illegally issuing a variance has not yet been scheduled by the court system.https://twitter.com/The_Petrichory/status/1501228802545831937 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP
I mean the one against Amazon for not paying you according to your contract.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.