been arguing this for decades; glad to welcome frens to my positionhttps://twitter.com/robkroese/status/1499048574096707587 …
-
-
3/ also, we have no reason to believe that all of the atoms of our universe are being simulated w the same fidelity that the atoms in a particle accelerator on Earth are being simulated ; the mesh size could be adaptive maybe distance galaxies take 12 bytes to represent in toto
Show this thread -
4/ also, I will be touching on this topic in Aristillus 3 and 4https://twitter.com/MorganColeBooks/status/1499050452251516928 …
Show this thread -
5/ hmmm (a) not so sure about "just" (b) disagree that "it's not A, it's B". I believe that A and B are two equally valid ways of explaining/viewing phenomenahttps://twitter.com/sound_hologram/status/1499052779926536192 …
Show this thread -
6/ I worked w a physicist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Margolus … who strongly believed that (a) the universe was digital in nature (b) speed of light and time dilation was the propagation delay in the underlying calculation matrixhttps://twitter.com/lordvictor/status/1499054271362441227 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and you can run the simulation at whatever speed you choose. no way to tell from the inside that one second takes 10,000 years of compute time outside
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if its not, understanding God as a programmer is a method I enjoy to explain things.
-
computational universe also explains the arrow of time
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also from our view inside the simulation it doesn’t matter how long the computations take - if one second for us is a trillion years for them, it looks the same
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.