2/ for non CS STEM stuff, yes, I agree, this is the most effective currently available path ...however at my university, on-topic classes were ~ 1/3 of total course load, bc of mandatory distributions (i.e. cross subsidies to useless departments)https://twitter.com/josecamoessilva/status/1486838006480654338 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ > you never know what you'll need This is why every rocket should included wings, parachutes, crew capsule, retro rockets, landing gear for lunar dust situations, balloons for water landing - sure, boosts the cost and weight, lowers payload but...https://twitter.com/josecamoessilva/status/1486841867987681280 …
Show this thread -
4/ The point of the sarcasm of course is that "building in all sorts of stuff on the OFF chance that you'll need it" falls afoul of optimizing on other axises. I suspect that there's a Dijkstra quote that fits this...
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Okay. And for most people the most effective and efficient way to get that knowledge is going to one of these universities and get the degree that confirms they have done so (and, coincidentally, that they can work within an existing system, which they'll need to).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.