2/
MIT paying someone who is ACCUSED but not yet convicted is good. To say otherwise is to say "Cancel mobs are good, actually...but only when led by the 
globo-homo FBI".
If the FBI truly got their man red-handed, he'll be convicted. A competent defense will not stop that
-
-
Show this thread
-
4/ the intersection of people who 1) are outraged that Saint Kyle was unfairly targeted by corrupt prosecutors 2) are outraged that the Jan 6 protesters are unfairly prosecuted by the corrupt FBI 3) are outraged that a professor prosecuted by the FBI can afford lawyers smdh
Show this thread -
5/ It is well know that I am very suspicious of cops and think that most of them are bad people. ...and yet I still do not join the bandwagon of "OMG OMG this cop was accused of ____ why is he still drawing a salary!?!?!" >>>
Show this thread -
6/ now, of course, double standards are bad, and cops should be treated like normal people, and police departments should act like normal employers ...
Show this thread -
7/ but re "why is this employer still paying someone who has been ACCUSED of a crime!?!?!?!": that's a retarded take all it takes to accuse someone of a crime is ... opening one's mouth employers showing a bit of discretion / loyalty is a good thing
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Almost as if we have a right to trial by peers and presumption of innocence until proven guilty for a reason
-
I seem to remember a name for this. Rue Rawcess? Something like that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.