Also... ouch, mang.
-
-
Replying to @VarangianSkull @NoLongerBennett and
Dude, it wasn’t an insult. Morlock and Bennett are each precise for different reasons. Precision has value but it’s not the only value.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @skirtsnhose @VarangianSkull and
ooh, now I want to hear what the different reasons are
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @VarangianSkull and
Bear in mind this is a qualitative gut feel so I could be wrong, but: You: reeee (autist) Bennett: lawyer training in distinctions bordering on pedantry
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @skirtsnhose @MorlockP and
I will say, though, that
@BostonDelendEst is the king of the latter.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @MorlockP @skirtsnhose and
re this whole thread, can’t you calculate how correlated they have to be for thales to be wrong?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @raptros_ @skirtsnhose and
sure, I could ...but the ROI on doing so is nearly zero
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
the ROI on that was higher, I presume
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NoLongerBennett @MorlockP and
you know I wondered what the rw twitter version of the Drake equation was and I think we've got a contender
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.