People who were in the crowds did not "participate in a riot". People who stormed the building absolutely did use violence. And yes I agree that current Anglo law is non-objective in how it identifies when someone is no longer a threat and can go free.
-
-
-
I don't have a strong stance on what should constitute proof of no longer being a threat. For some crimes I suppose simply a long enough time of reasonable behavior in prison would suffice.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.