-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Annoyance
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
prob either PM10 or PM2.5 important values, esp for PM2.5, but this def isn't about CO2, and prob not NOx either
-
You are right ! It’s PM2.5
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't know, but it looks like your weirdest political compass yet.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hysteria.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't understand how it could be physically possible for a lawn mower to produce that much... whatever it is they say is being produced
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably CO2 "pollution." Yep, let's get that out of the air. Plant growth is up 15% worldwide on higher CO2, so reducing it will hurt food crops for poor farmers in the third world. But why worry about that when there's virtues to signal?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.