7/ Yes, one team wants laws that protect unborn children. Yes, those laws definitionaly infringe on choices others want to make. Both narratives are coherent / true / explain the facts. I tend to trust the positive claims each team makes about their own motivations
-
-
18/ are institutionally weak but haven't faced a external / secular (long term trend of migration and gentrification) / autistic shock is EXACTLY when risk of drone-strike-the-red-shirt is at the highest Regime legitimacy is uncertain, a child says the emperor has no clothes...
Show this thread -
19/ ...and a public poll / warrant article / ballot question crystallizes hidden sentiment and displays the results in the open, revealing the Schelling point that has existed but been unexposed all this time. Exciting times. Sucks to be a poor SOB in a red shirt, tho >>>
Show this thread -
20/ ...because you were following the rules AS YOU UNDERSTOOD THEM TO EXIST (rule of man), and your internal narrative was just as legitimate as anyone else's. exeunt
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.