62/ The ZBA did not correct the lies in the minutes.
-
Show this thread
-
63/ However, it turns out that the ZBA HAD been listening to me when I said that there was a site on the eastern edge of the property that was legal and flat and where the barn could be built.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
64/ The ZBA, I believe, wanted to disprove that claim...so they organized a secret meeting that violated the right-to-know / public-meeting laws, and went to inspect that location - without me present Unfortunately [ for them ] they saw I was right - there WAS a valid site
1 reply 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
65/ So they did exactly what you'd expect a criminal gang of retarded monkeys to do - they engaged in a coverup and pretended that there was never a second illegal site visit. I FOIA-ed their emails, and they said "there are no emails". This was a lie. There WERE emails.
2 replies 1 retweet 33 likesShow this thread -
66/ I learned this when I instructed my attorney to sue the town to turn over missing records. The opposing attorney caved before we even filed a lawsuit. She dug up the emails and forwarded them. I'm going to show those emails in a sec... but remember their claim: 3" of ice
2 replies 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
67/ ok, here we go - site visit on 8 Dec, snow on the ground, zero ice - I document this fact in a letter the same day - 11 Dec, ZBA returns for illegal 2nd site visit, sends emails TO HIMSELF with pix ... documenting no ice (below) - ~20 Dec, ZBA chair lies, claims 3" icepic.twitter.com/rQduXVASuu
3 replies 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
68/ Read his email [ to himself ] "X and I walked the area around the four boundaries". When I was present it was IMPOSSIBLE to walk the boundaries bc I was there as a witness. Therefore "3 inches ice" gets invented. 72 hours later, he walks the boundaries [ no witnesses ]
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
69/ TLDR: in paragraph 22, we claim "they didn't do a legit site visit bc they didn't want to" they claim "no, there was ice" ...but the evidence is 500% clear - there was no ice, and they did the real site visit later, when I wasn't there ...and tried to hide it from me.
2 replies 1 retweet 29 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Mike the Grate
70/ I find that lawyers love
#BarnLaw as much or more than casuals - seeing such an absolute !@#-show blows their minds.https://twitter.com/mikethegratest/status/1451561212618096641 …ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
4 replies 0 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MorlockP
I’m not even a litigator (I flirted with it but the penicillin took) and I’m like this is one of the best examples of how all of this is SUPPOSED to work. And I love every minute of it. Sorry for you tho’
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
> this is one of the best examples of how all of this is SUPPOSED to work. can you expand on that ? I don't follow. TY !
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP
Yessir. Gimme a second to get home and I’ll expand on this!!
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.