65/ So they did exactly what you'd expect a criminal gang of retarded monkeys to do - they engaged in a coverup and pretended that there was never a second illegal site visit. I FOIA-ed their emails, and they said "there are no emails". This was a lie. There WERE emails.
-
Show this thread
-
66/ I learned this when I instructed my attorney to sue the town to turn over missing records. The opposing attorney caved before we even filed a lawsuit. She dug up the emails and forwarded them. I'm going to show those emails in a sec... but remember their claim: 3" of ice
2 replies 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
67/ ok, here we go - site visit on 8 Dec, snow on the ground, zero ice - I document this fact in a letter the same day - 11 Dec, ZBA returns for illegal 2nd site visit, sends emails TO HIMSELF with pix ... documenting no ice (below) - ~20 Dec, ZBA chair lies, claims 3" icepic.twitter.com/rQduXVASuu
3 replies 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
68/ Read his email [ to himself ] "X and I walked the area around the four boundaries". When I was present it was IMPOSSIBLE to walk the boundaries bc I was there as a witness. Therefore "3 inches ice" gets invented. 72 hours later, he walks the boundaries [ no witnesses ]
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
69/ TLDR: in paragraph 22, we claim "they didn't do a legit site visit bc they didn't want to" they claim "no, there was ice" ...but the evidence is 500% clear - there was no ice, and they did the real site visit later, when I wasn't there ...and tried to hide it from me.
2 replies 1 retweet 29 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Mike the Grate
70/ I find that lawyers love
#BarnLaw as much or more than casuals - seeing such an absolute !@#-show blows their minds.https://twitter.com/mikethegratest/status/1451561212618096641 …ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
4 replies 0 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
71/ I sure hope so. https://twitter.com/ActiveOgre/status/1451560672706314251 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Workin’ Class Knight
72/ Several lawyers have told me that I should definitely sell it at law trade shows / market it for lawyers / etc.https://twitter.com/wrknclassknight/status/1451566403983663121 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
2 replies 0 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted CArefugee ❌
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
2 replies 0 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Dedicating Ruckus
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
2 replies 0 retweets 30 likesShow this thread
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Dr. Drunken Kobold, Esq.
75/ two things: 1) to date, we've been to court once, and that was a simple matter "was this permit legally issued?". At that point there was no FOIA evasion, secret meetings, etc. 2) judges rule on simple questions of law, they don't >>>https://twitter.com/DrunkKobold/status/1451656336966520833 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
-
-
76/ weigh in on "is this person being super crappy" UNLESS that crappy behavior is in their court room, or unless the case goes in a certain direction where one party is asking for sanctions or whatever
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
77/ now, that said, judges certainly are capable of appreciating the totality of the situation, and while we don't really need that in the upcoming case (where we are asking him to answer a simple question "was this variance legally granted?"), I suspect he'll "get it".
0 replies 0 retweets 17 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.