59/
#BarnLaw continues
our claim / their rebuttal
My claim is "they lied about it in the minutes".
Their response is "...not according to the minutes we wrote, we didn't!"
Extraordinary!pic.twitter.com/Ut2dguOPPV
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
70/
I find that lawyers love #BarnLaw as much or more than casuals - seeing such an absolute !@#-show blows their minds.https://twitter.com/mikethegratest/status/1451561212618096641 …
71/ I sure hope so. https://twitter.com/ActiveOgre/status/1451560672706314251 …
72/ Several lawyers have told me that I should definitely sell it at law trade shows / market it for lawyers / etc.https://twitter.com/wrknclassknight/status/1451566403983663121 …
75/ two things: 1) to date, we've been to court once, and that was a simple matter "was this permit legally issued?". At that point there was no FOIA evasion, secret meetings, etc. 2) judges rule on simple questions of law, they don't >>>https://twitter.com/DrunkKobold/status/1451656336966520833 …
76/ weigh in on "is this person being super crappy" UNLESS that crappy behavior is in their court room, or unless the case goes in a certain direction where one party is asking for sanctions or whatever
77/ now, that said, judges certainly are capable of appreciating the totality of the situation, and while we don't really need that in the upcoming case (where we are asking him to answer a simple question "was this variance legally granted?"), I suspect he'll "get it".
So is the judge just super patient with them? I feel like if the situation were reversed with a layman making shit up and skirting the rules and the town playing everything by the book, the judge would have nailed the layman to the wall. But I have no expertise, pure assumption.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.