56/
ok gang, someone remind me tomorrow to start up #BarnLaw with paragraph 22 of the complaint & answer
this one is a MONSTER - this is where we find lies, falsified government documents, FOIA requests, and more
...and in the mean time, buy my books!
https://www.amazon.com/Travis-J-I-Corcoran/e/B06XF15CC8/ref=dp_byline_cont_pop_book_1 …
-
-
67/ ok, here we go - site visit on 8 Dec, snow on the ground, zero ice - I document this fact in a letter the same day - 11 Dec, ZBA returns for illegal 2nd site visit, sends emails TO HIMSELF with pix ... documenting no ice (below) - ~20 Dec, ZBA chair lies, claims 3" icepic.twitter.com/rQduXVASuu
Show this thread -
68/ Read his email [ to himself ] "X and I walked the area around the four boundaries". When I was present it was IMPOSSIBLE to walk the boundaries bc I was there as a witness. Therefore "3 inches ice" gets invented. 72 hours later, he walks the boundaries [ no witnesses ]
Show this thread -
69/ TLDR: in paragraph 22, we claim "they didn't do a legit site visit bc they didn't want to" they claim "no, there was ice" ...but the evidence is 500% clear - there was no ice, and they did the real site visit later, when I wasn't there ...and tried to hide it from me.
Show this thread -
70/ I find that lawyers love
#BarnLaw as much or more than casuals - seeing such an absolute !@#-show blows their minds.https://twitter.com/mikethegratest/status/1451561212618096641 …Show this thread -
71/ I sure hope so. https://twitter.com/ActiveOgre/status/1451560672706314251 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
72/ Several lawyers have told me that I should definitely sell it at law trade shows / market it for lawyers / etc.https://twitter.com/wrknclassknight/status/1451566403983663121 …
Show this thread -
75/ two things: 1) to date, we've been to court once, and that was a simple matter "was this permit legally issued?". At that point there was no FOIA evasion, secret meetings, etc. 2) judges rule on simple questions of law, they don't >>>https://twitter.com/DrunkKobold/status/1451656336966520833 …
Show this thread -
76/ weigh in on "is this person being super crappy" UNLESS that crappy behavior is in their court room, or unless the case goes in a certain direction where one party is asking for sanctions or whatever
Show this thread -
77/ now, that said, judges certainly are capable of appreciating the totality of the situation, and while we don't really need that in the upcoming case (where we are asking him to answer a simple question "was this variance legally granted?"), I suspect he'll "get it".
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.