3/ This is awesome. Look at the exact wording of our claim: "the Town tried to amend its zoning ordinance to overrule this court's final decision in case XYZ" Town: "yes, your Honor, that's EXACTLY what we did, but it's ok, because..."
-
Show this thread
-
4/ Put aside the merits. Just look at the emotional framing and wording here. The town could have taken the same argument and addressed it in a way where the connotations were much less of a slap in the face to the judge (who may or may not end up being the same judge). >>>
1 reply 2 retweets 57 likesShow this thread -
5/ E.g. "Plaintiff is correct that the town sought to change the zoning code, but that was not at all an attempt to overturn the court's decision, but an acknowledgement that the court was correct that the old wording said X, and it had always been the intention of the town to..
2 replies 2 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
6/ Also, our case in general builds an easy to understand narrative (which is 200% true) that the town bent or broke every rule it could find to help one party and disadvantage another. That narrative starts w this paragraph...and town says "YEP, WE DID THAT !"
1 reply 2 retweets 62 likesShow this thread -
7/ ok, just passed 20 RTs time for another comparison...
2 replies 0 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
8/ paragraph 3 our allegations / their defeinsepic.twitter.com/L5qKjvDm3U
1 reply 1 retweet 40 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
10/ So when the town claims "concrete floor? what concrete floor? We have no information about that!" they are ... flat out lying.
2 replies 1 retweet 36 likesShow this thread -
2 replies 1 retweet 27 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @WEMcCormick
ah crap oh well, too deep in the thread to fix now :(
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.