2/ This is in the 40% I strongly agree withhttps://twitter.com/virgil_30/status/1447145848979214339?t=7AqaAdu6QptzZA4QUnAWbg&s=19 …
-
-
Show this thread
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will say though that isn’t he early gifted programs the ‘enrichment’ was crappy make work. I was in the program one year and then got out.
-
Our gifted program was awesome Lotta lectures on fun stuff, self directed activities, special field trips
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Man, I'm glad we didn't have group projects when I was a kid.
End of conversation
-
-
-
It does correctly point to two different SMART PERSON archetypes that are always at war. The pleasant, smooth, competent socially adept but boring one, and the brilliant, complex, not socially adept/rebellious one
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I see what he's saying here, but I would be happy for a "gifted" program that was make-work. My district has NO resources for smart-enough-to-be-bored kids in K-5. Won't even let them skip grades. "No Child Left Behind" means no kid can be allowed to go ahead, either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"If you are so smart why aren't you popular?" It's a good point, as far as it goes. Which happens to be ... actually quite far. "I'm weird, accept me as I am" isn't going to cut it. You have to (somehow) learn to be (at least) tolerable to others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.