7/
good side thread from @asymmetricinfohttps://twitter.com/asymmetricinfo/status/1443945129279115267 …
-
-
18/ ok, a quick moment between CI runs: anti-fragility makes it much easier to ask for higher numbers if you're living paycheck to paycheck and NEED to bill 40 hours next week to make the rent, you are trapped at a local optima where you can't risk even a 1% chance of losing >
Show this thread -
19/ a client, even if there is a 90% chance that you can increase your rate by 20% negotiate from a position of strength and an ability to deal with high[er] variance
Show this thread -
22/ re "position of strength" >>>https://twitter.com/MorlockP/status/1443953621155069959 …
Show this thread -
23/ this may be the best dramatic monologue on financial planning and risk taking ever I watch it again every few weekshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJjKP8vYjpQ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Getting to yes was assigned reading in a negotiations MBA course I took in the late 80s/early 90s. I thought the book was good but mostly fairly obvious. Most of the course was a bunch of exercises, probably written at Harvard, where we roleplayed multi-party negotiations. 1/x
-
The exercises were pointless. Everyone got points based on the final outcome, but there was always an outcome that gave everyone points they needed for an A, by getting some percent of what their role wanted. It was really easy to determine this and there was no real negotiation
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.