3/ A culture of marriage, monogamy, and pair bonding is a redistribution mechanism, a progressive tax, that lands hardest on the top men, who instead of getting an absolute top woman and then also 50 to 200 more very good woman, get merely 2 or 3 top men. >>>
-
Show this thread
-
4/ It redistributes those top women downwards to the "upper middle class" equivalent sexual-market-value men, who in turn redistribute their women down, etc etc with the end result that the bottom 50% of men get to marry, love, and have kids.
1 reply 1 retweet 37 likesShow this thread -
5/ All arguments of this sort are vociferously rejected by the left, because the left has a baptists-and-bootleggers dynamic re sexual morality: half of them think that women should be absolutely unconstrained in their ability to pursue repeated flings with top men...
1 reply 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
6/ ...and the other half are either top men, or men who think that they can profit in the same way that top men do (i.e. sexual access) if they parrot enough left wing cant at women.
4 replies 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Red Headed Steppeson
7/ unfettered markets are always the best way to optimize allocation of resources with in the market ...but there's a hidden gotcha buried in there. What's "in" the market, and what's outside?https://twitter.com/TheLumpenprole/status/1435959710822412288 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Red Headed Steppeson @TheLumpenproleReplying to @MorlockPIts fascinating, I’d been considering a post bout this recently, in how the structures of a ‘patriarchy’ are really the top men managing to get most women on board. The rest of men are mostly irrelevant. You need the women to make any system work. Men will follow.1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
8/ If property and factories and coins are privately owned, but rivers are unowned, then the market will optimize trading coins for widgets from the factory ...and the rivers will end up filled with waste and effluent.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
9/ If rivers are privately owned but there are no property rights in factories (as per, say, Cory Doctorow's Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom) then all of the machines in factories will end up broken inside of a week, but the rivers will be clean.
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
10/ If male bodies, female bodies, and abortion clinics are all privately owned, but marriage is an unenforceable contract, then there will be a very efficient market in sex without strings attached which does a near perfect job of allocating sex to the men who most "deserve" it
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
11/ but the bottom 30% of men will be single, the bottom 50% of men will be childless, and the top 10% of men will cycle through girlfriends and/or wives every 5-10 years. This has negative externalities on children, but children have no enforceable right to have two parents,,,
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MorlockP
Also there will be a war, or several, until the system collapses into a state with lower potential for violent revolt by men who have no prospects.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
doubt it the betas don't do crap but complain
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP
Hmm. Maybe. I honestly don't know enough history to back up any of my claims, so...
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.