6/ Takes include: * "This guy isn't committing a crime, why won't the crazy government leave him alone ?!?!?" narrator: he is trespassing and squatting...which are crimes
-
Show this thread
-
7/ * "Why won't the government respect property rights ?!?!?" [ the government is enforcing the property rights of the owner of the property ] * "An 80 year old man should never be jailed!" [ gov said that he can walk out of the cell as soon as he agrees to stop trespassing ]
1 reply 1 retweet 28 likesShow this thread -
8/ TLDR: people are morons [ priors have not been updated today ]
3 replies 1 retweet 63 likesShow this thread -
9/ now battling w someone in the comment threads re the squatter.pic.twitter.com/C7sIO5S7L5
4 replies 1 retweet 26 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Karl K. Gallagher
10/ from what I can tell, ownership of the land changed hands squatter says "I had a verbal agreement with the dead man", new owner says "I've got no evidence of that", judge asks "any further data?", squatter screams and drops f bombshttps://twitter.com/KarlKGallagher/status/1421114393870413825 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
3 replies 0 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Lawyer Dog
11/ adverse possession has to be actual, open and notorious, exclusive, adverse and continuous adverse means "without permission" so if he had permission, not adverse, so no A.P. if he didn't, he's a squatter...and it doesn't seem to be "open"https://twitter.com/TheClarksTale/status/1421116959031128067 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
12/ further, article seems to say that building codes are also in play, and non profits were willing to work w the squatter to get utilities connected, but he refused so,,,
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Marc “Except You, You're All Right” Whipple
13/ This approach "let's trust what he says. If X is true, then he is hoisted on petard Y ; if S is true, then petard T" is exactly like
#BarnLaw >>>https://twitter.com/WhippleMarc/status/1421124150765182980 …ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Marc “Except You, You're All Right” Whipple @WhippleMarcReplying to @skirtsnhose @KarlKGallagher @MorlockPYep. Can’t be AP, because he claims permission. Can’t be a legal estate, because NH SoF requires a writing. Even if everything he says is true, he literally can’t have a protectable interest. Maybe *especially* if everything he says is true.2 replies 0 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
14/ multiple examples: * Zoning board chair says that he read my memo in objection to variance in full. If he did, then he knows that there's a Cease and Desist, and the variance can't be granted bc "personal circumstances". If he was lying, then he was derelict in his duty.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
15/ * variance applicant said in court that there were other places he could have put the structure. If this is true, then he can't get a variance, because of “other reasonably feasible methods” sub prong of the hardship prong. If, OTOH, he lied, then he perjured himself.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted CK_Dexter_Haven
16/ next zoning board meeting is on Tuesday three outcomes that I see: * variance denied (super unlikely) * variance approved (we immediately sue to overturn) * application rejected for rework (most likely, IMO, bc the application is laugable)https://twitter.com/rog_thronhill/status/1421121353021890560 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
-
-
17/ "Application returned for rework" is most annoying, because it stretches out the timeline for another 6 months or something ... and is unfair, as I TOLD ZBA 9 months ago exactly how the application was defective, and yet the rejection would give him a 2nd bite at the apple
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
18/ My atty and I are in agreement that if the ZBA returns the application for rework, we sue immediately for summary judgement (I think that's the term) because there is no possible way a variance can legally be granted, and this charade has gone on long enough.
2 replies 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.