well, of course if classical liberals were Christian integrationists, they'd be Christian integrationists, not classical liberals "Conservative Jews will join Christians to fight secularization, but will not then turn to Christ" duh
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JRstract
I absolutely agree w you on the tension / lack of easy compatibility. I don't have an answer, because I don't think there is an answer. I wouldn't want to live in a pure Christian Integrationist society, nor would I choose to live in a pure Libertarian / Market society. >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"which is better? rain, or sunshine?" I like them both, I have problems with both. "so you want it to rain and be sunny at the same time?" I didn't say that there are a host of possible angles here. * what's best? * what do I want? * which is stable? and there are no >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
easy answers to any of them. I suppose I endorse Kegan 5 here, off in the direction of
@Meaningness . Different systems work for different purposes (and each system tries to totalize, which renders it weaker than a suite of systems)0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JRstract @Meaningness
the Aristillus books noticeably have Christians and Mormons in an extreme ancap society I will delve into this more in the sequels
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
note that they are embedded IN an ancap society ;they are not co-extensive with it / identical to it
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.