Total or in the last week? Cus they killed 60+ children in the last bout of their bombing, and 200 plus people total.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The claim that Hamas is using ‘human shields’ is never actually substantiated, at best you get ‘Hamas stores weapons/launched attacks inside the dense bantustan Israel has set up called Gaza.’ Israel is the bad guy cus they’re on stolen property though, tbh.pic.twitter.com/IP7qySuulX
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @TheLumpenprole
show me any population on Earth that ISN'T on stolen property you live in North America, right, white man?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
Do you apply this logic to any other situation? If someone came and kicked you off your land, would you be justified in fighting them? If a native was to come and showed clear evidence that they are the descendent of someone whose land was taken, they’d be right to claim it.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @TheLumpenprole
I apply it to pretty much EVERY situation which is why I phrased my challenge in the form of a universal again: "show me any population on Earth that ISN'T on stolen property"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
This is an argument against property rights. You have to realize this, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheLumpenprole
> This is an argument against property rights. You have to realize this, right? This is poor argumentation. It is not an argument against property rights. It is an argument against conventional norms of property rights. >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @TheLumpenprole
You have a choice: admit that might [ and time ] somehow make right, or argue that any use of force anywhere in the history of a property transaction renders the current ownership rights invalid I choose the first branch
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
Then you literally reject property rights, period? Like thats the only logical end of such a position. And if so, why would I not choose my side as arbitrarily? In that case, I side against the state that levels Christian villages on Christmas.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
> Then you literally reject property rights, period? I never once said that. I'm tagging out of this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.