Total or in the last week? Cus they killed 60+ children in the last bout of their bombing, and 200 plus people total.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The claim that Hamas is using ‘human shields’ is never actually substantiated, at best you get ‘Hamas stores weapons/launched attacks inside the dense bantustan Israel has set up called Gaza.’ Israel is the bad guy cus they’re on stolen property though, tbh.pic.twitter.com/IP7qySuulX
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @TheLumpenprole
show me any population on Earth that ISN'T on stolen property you live in North America, right, white man?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @TheLumpenprole
This is an absurd cope. States seizing territory from other states does not always entail the seizure of private property and the wholesale expulsion of previous inhabitants. The American seizure of Northern Mexico, for example, did not uproot one single Mexican from their land.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @anarchyinblack @TheLumpenprole
ok, so my point would only be valid if the US had invaded and displaced, say, Indian tribes, and forced them off their land and onto reservations? Good thing for your argument that never happened.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @anarchyinblack
Yes, that is also bad. Are you saying its good, or defensible?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheLumpenprole @anarchyinblack
not defensible, but I'm looking for a coherent and universally applied standard if it's morally valid for Hamas to attack Israeli civilians, is it also valid for American Indians to kill you and your loved ones? why / why not ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @anarchyinblack
Well, for one, I don’t live on former Indian lands. Some folks live on land that was bought legitimately. Most that live on land that was stolen can find no member of any native tribe that could show any claim to that land, either cus they no longer exist or there is no record.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
As I said, if such a person could show such documentation, they’d be entirely valid to try to reclaim that land, with force if opposed. Thats the consistent moral principle. As Israeli civilians live openly and knowingly on stolen property, and refuse to return it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
> documentation so it's only possible to steal land from literate people who have registries of deeds and a western style system of law? amazing
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP @TheLumpenprole
Man-made structures are one form of proof of landownership. In the absence of those man-made structures, one does tend to require evidence in the form of written words, yes.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.