1/ good thread to go off on a tangent (a very wide tangent): there is always a tension between adjusting things to tweak the marginal incentives, and adjusting things in a way that hammers people well out of the mainstream that's cryptic; let me expand >>> https://twitter.com/gaitanalyst/status/1387023943496765441 …
> Assuming a physical cause without evidence is bad science. Right, so cancer - although known to the Greeks - did not show up on any TESTS before 20th century, so it was a real problem, but not a medical problem. Saying cancer was a medical problem before ~ 1900 = bad science.
-
-
you're moving the goal posts in every tweet - you switch between "physical cause" and "physical abnormality", between "chemical imbalances" revealed by tests, and other techniques. This is ... not helpful / interesting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
