SCiEntIfiC cAsEhttps://twitter.com/romohseni/status/1374035863823392770 …
-
-
I sometimes find the Aesthetic case compelling for about three minutes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"If you say that that transwomen are/aren't women, you're denying science." No, the argument is about the definition of woman, and the values of either choice of definition, not (only) about realities of psychology or biology.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It sounds like he's having a "correlation/causation + confirmation bias" issue.. "I don't like religion interfering in people's lives" -> "Anti-porn people and Religious people overlap" -> "Anti-porn must be, essentially, religious" -> "Religion isn't science!!" -> Anti-porn sux.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was the old science. New science tells us Trump is bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
clearly you haven't been reading r/science
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe you're referring to science. We're doing Science now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Studies solve some relationship and utilitarians are using them to make the case for [...]" is too long for a title.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.